AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
The amount was first advanced by the company, but will be deducted from his monthly salary. Thus, he was made to pay the amount of P15,000.00 to answer for the damages caused to the said vehicle. On December 11, 2014, while driving along North Luzon Expressway, respondent hit the rear portion of the vehicle in front of him. He was assigned to drive for the petitioner, one of the company's top officials and received P9,000.00 monthly salary. Respondent alleged that he was hired as a company driver by CRV Corporation in May 2012. Atienza (petitioner) and CRV Corporation before the NLRC. The instant case stemmed from the complaint for illegal dismissal, non-payment of wages, overtime pay, holiday pay, premium pay for work on holidays and rest day, illegal deduction, and issuance of a certificate of employment filed by Noel Sacramento Saluta (respondent) against Celia R. 04-04089-15, while the questioned CA Resolution denied petitioner's motion for reconsideration. ![]() 01-000121-16 which reversed and set aside the OctoDecision 5 of the Labor Arbiter in NLRC NCR Case No. The questioned CA Decision affirmed with modification the ApDecision 3 and the JResolution 4 of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC LAC No. ![]() ![]() Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari seeking to reverse and set aside the ApDecision 1 and the AugResolution 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |